Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Ahem, but "profession" instead of "professional" is a grammatical mistake, not a spelling mistake. You spelled professions just fine.
As for Hillary on Iraq: precedence says otherwise. Maybe you remember her stance on health care. In addition, it's the same thing Bill did in 1991.
http://www.observer.com/2008/hillary...too?page=0%2C1
|
By that logic there is no such thing as a spelling mistake ever, as whatever got spelled, rather an actual word or not, was spelled correctly for it. This matter clearly boils down to intent. If I meant to write profession instead of professional then it would be a grammar error, but as you've clearly noticed professional is what I meant, thus making it a spelling error.
Anyway, so her ploy (from the Observer? What kind of a socialist are you, anyway =P) was to play the Iraq vote politically safely? Listen, Congress was given faulty information by the administration, execution did not culminate as planned, and virtually the entire party wants to undue the impact of that vote. Yeah, I wish Hillary hadn't voted for Iraq and that Barak would've been in the Senate at the time to vote against it as he said he would have; not that it would have changed anything, but it would make me happier. But that didn't happen and we live in an a world over five years later and what I care about now is not pointing the finger but fixing the damage. I believe both candidates are committed to that goal and will do what is in their power, if elected, to that end.