|
And the brain-washing of the Obamaniacs reaches fruition here.
That is the most ridiculous thing ever. Hillary is the more experienced politician and hasn't even begun to run against McCain. Many prominent Republicans have stated they would prefer Hillary to McCain, much less Obama who represents extreme liberalism to them. Furthermore, Hillary was killing Obama in the polls early on and things shifted after she started getting labeled as a dirty player. I won't contest that now, but the point is that she has run into difficulty against the Obama campaign because Obama doesn't have the record, experience, or age for the Clinton machine to drudge up much. Against that fossil McCain the Clinton machine will destroy the old coot! As a final analytical note, Obama might be able to pull that [s]he's-playing-dirty crap in the primaries against Hillary, in a party that wants to take the moral high ground, but the Republicans won't have those inclinations. They will attack him in every single way and his whining about it won't win him votes in the general election.
Finally, if you don't want to buy into my analysis you can look at all post-Super Tuesday polls. I'll argue they aren't forward looking or important since they neither candidate has begun competing against McCain, but if you want to take a freeze frame now they have Clinton winning by around 3% and Obama by 7%.
__________________
"The courts that first rode the warhorse of virtual representation into battle on the res judicata front invested their steed with near-magical properties." ~27 F.3d 751
|