Quote:
Originally posted by Charlatan
I didn't bring up either Muhammed or Budda
|
But I did. And there was a reason why I did. Of course you don't deny them. They are more recent phenomenons Islam is only about 1500 years old which is real young in the religious world. Budhhism isn't much older. So we don't deny them. My question is why deny someone simply because it is older? I mean in 4000 years I bet people will be debating with there really WAS a Siddhartha Gautama. What I am saying is most everything I have read about Abraham(Most of which was from 100% secular sources) generally consider him, atleast most likely, a real person. And to deny he was real merely because he is a religious figure and from over 5000 years ago is ... I dunno. Not good.