Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
guns are not illegal, therefore your implication is false.
|
The guns are stolen property. It's illegal to be in possession of stolen property. This isn't complicated.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
Thats not what I said. Because the law affects ONLY law abiding people, it should be abolished and that those who commit criminal acts with guns should then be prosecuted.
|
You think background checks don't effect people that don't pass?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
a nuke is not a gun, this is a worthless argument and only shows your desperation.
|
A nuke is a weapon and the only way that you seem to register the seriousness of the situation is by comparing it to it's ultimate interpretation.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
before you get all insulted, read the rest of the statement as it applies perfectly.
|
"You're delusional if you believe *insert exaggerated and incorrect interpretation of what I said here*" is still an attempt t call me delusional.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
A background check should not be required for the exercise or enjoyment of a right and if said convict cannot be trusted on the outside, why is he outside?
|
Why? because you can't be imprisoned because you could commit a crime. Intent alone cannot convict and that's as it should be. The funny thing is that if you read into your argument, either people are trustworthy or they should be in jail. Do you understand the concept of why black and white thinking is wrong?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
so we're back to only letting people exercise rights when YOU trust them? can I have that power also?
|
You trust an ex convict found guilty of using a gun to have a gun. I call bs.