Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
You are correct. If they were taken at different times and if WTC 7 had a collapse of some sort long after the collapse of WTC 1 (option 3), then the pictures do not contradict each other. Thus, further information is needed:
1) Any other evidence, including eyewitness reports, that can verify a collapse that happened after the immediate damage of the collapse of WTC 1
2) Specific verifiable times of each photograph.
3) Further photographic or video evidence of WTC 7 immediately before it's collapse.
|
This was my point - that those two photographs alone are not enough to prove anything about the amount of damage (either way).
So we should not use those two photographs (in the state that we have them - i.e. without times) together, without any further evidence, with regards to amount of damage or as proof of a cover up.
OK, I am going to take a look at the rest of what was posted since back then in the therad.