Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
So you want right of privacy to be re-interpreted to conveniently fit your law rather than judicial precedent.
|
There's no reinterpretation. Roe v. Wade has never been used to discuss the ownership of the information of the paternal line. It has yet to be interpreted, therefore arguing this with the law is moot. There is no precedence.
It will have to be argued on it's merits.
BTW, the "right to be left alone" doesn't necessarily have anything to do with this from a legal standing.