View Single Post
Old 01-25-2008, 04:08 PM   #22 (permalink)
Willravel
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Oops! Sorry, I missed this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticky
So the issue we are left with regarding the pictures is the timing of the pictures used in the NIST report.
This is absolutely correct. We are to assume the picture took place some time between the collapse of WTC 1 and the collapse of WTC 7, which leaves us quite a bit of time. The damage in the NIST picture was credited to the collapse of WTC 1, but it's not said if the damage was immediately caused. Unfortunately, further information simply doesn't exist to the public.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticky
Is this solvable? If not, maybe we can't compare these images as two seperate truths as if they were seperate (and different) images of the same point in time.
You are correct. If they were taken at different times and if WTC 7 had a collapse of some sort long after the collapse of WTC 1 (option 3), then the pictures do not contradict each other. Thus, further information is needed:
1) Any other evidence, including eyewitness reports, that can verify a collapse that happened after the immediate damage of the collapse of WTC 1
2) Specific verifiable times of each photograph.
3) Further photographic or video evidence of WTC 7 immediately before it's collapse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticky
I think it is correct to say that the actions that caused the damage to WTC7 are the collapses of one or both WTC1 and WTC2.
That's one theory.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticky
I do think, however, that not all of the evidence of damage shows right away but can take some time to show up. After the initial damage is inflicted on WTC7 it is possible that the damaged area can degrade more as time passes (pieces that were broken, cracked, loosened can fall off).
This would be hypothetical option #3 from the post you responded to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticky
Anyway, my point is that time can be a factor and it is possible that the two images are truth at different points in time.
If we can't find out the time of the NIST image then the two images do not necessarily contradict each other.
There are other photographs taken of WTC 7 by the photographer available. Unfortunately, the times of the photographs are not available which doesn't help.
Willravel is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360