Willravel

The gentleman speaking at 4:00 is an editor for a publication, not any kind of expert on demolitions, explosives, buildings, or anything pertaining to the thread. In addition to this, he provides no evidence to supports his claims. He simply states his claims as fact.
6:00 "We didn't find any blasting caps in 5 years". The material from WTC 7 started shipping off days after 9/11 and has been completely gone for years. It was not shipped off to be investigated, but rather to be melted down. While his message would have one believe that they've been looking for this evidence for years, the fact is that they were only looking for a few days.
"Debris rained down, scooping out part of the building" We've already covered this.
"Fires raged on for the rest of the day" The "rest of the day" was actually only 7 hours.
"The trusses heated up from the fire and caused the collapse" This is, of course, incorrect. The link I included in my previous post proves this.
"There's strong evidence that the fires were fed by the fuel lines" And they don't supply said evidence.

I'm sorry, Jinn, but not only does the video attempt to exaggerate information, it's flat out wrong on some points and provides no evidence.