Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - Unanswered Questions Surrounding the 9/11 Attacks: Take 2

host · 01-25-2008, 02:44 AM

This is the actual original WTC 7 photo, scanned by the photographer, and displayed in his website. Click on the photo, <a href="http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/wtc-110.jpg">here</a> The larger version is more dramatic: 
<center><img src="http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/wtc-110_1_small.jpg"></center> I downloaded the large format (15 mb file size) photo file, and cropped the corner, right below the double floor area of burned windows, and above the top of the Winter Garden building, (probably the 12th is the lowest visible floor) in the foreground, using my lazy/easy to use "Photo Studio" program, and I uploaded the resulting 1.5 mb file to a web address: <img src="http://home.comcast.net/~qvc/wtc7sw.jpg" width="1298" height="1272"> The following two shots were obviously taken from a helicopter, after the twin towers had both collapsed, and the dust clouds from the second collapse had dissipated. The purpose of the follwoing shot is to give a perspective of just how far in from the Hudson river, the brown colored, reflective walled, WTC 7, actually was. The distinctive roof of the blue topped building, just to the right of WTC 7, helps to highlight the different angle in the bottom photo: <img src="http://home.comcast.net/~qvc/wtc7a.jpg" width="1200" height="900">
 I counted down from the top floor of WTC 7, and I believe that the SW corner area below the 23rd floor is visible in the shot, tending to offer more visual confirmation that the corner of WTC 7 was not "gouged out". I am still looking for support for opinions of others that the original shot from the NIST website, in willravel's first post, is certainly not the original "hi rez" file, taken by the NYPD helicopter photographer. Consider that I am showing you much better resolution, and evidence that other shots of WTC 7, not obscured by dust or smoke, are most likely available for NIST to examine and to Share with us, especially considering that <a href="http://www.construction.com/NewsCenter/Headlines/ENR/20021209g.asp">NIST made a public appeal</a> in 2002, for photos of WTC 7. <img src="http://home.comcast.net/~qvc/wtc7b.jpg">

01-25-2008, 02:44 AM	#8 (permalink)
host Banned	This is the actual original WTC 7 photo, scanned by the photographer, and displayed in his website. Click on the photo, <a href="http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/wtc-110.jpg">here</a> The larger version is more dramatic:<p><br> <center><img src="http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/wtc-110_1_small.jpg"></center><p><br>I downloaded the large format (15 mb file size) photo file, and cropped the corner, right below the double floor area of burned windows, and above the top of the Winter Garden building, (probably the 12th is the lowest visible floor) in the foreground, using my lazy/easy to use "Photo Studio" program, and I uploaded the resulting 1.5 mb file to a web address:<p><br><img src="http://home.comcast.net/~qvc/wtc7sw.jpg" width="1298" height="1272"><p><br>The following two shots were obviously taken from a helicopter, after the twin towers had both collapsed, and the dust clouds from the second collapse had dissipated. The purpose of the follwoing shot is to give a perspective of just how far in from the Hudson river, the brown colored, reflective walled, WTC 7, actually was. The distinctive roof of the blue topped building, just to the right of WTC 7, helps to highlight the different angle in the bottom photo:<br><img src="http://home.comcast.net/~qvc/wtc7a.jpg" width="1200" height="900"> <p><br>I counted down from the top floor of WTC 7, and I believe that the SW corner area below the 23rd floor is visible in the shot, tending to offer more visual confirmation that the corner of WTC 7 was not "gouged out". I am still looking for support for opinions of others that the original shot from the NIST website, in willravel's first post, is certainly not the original "hi rez" file, taken by the NYPD helicopter photographer. Consider that I am showing you much better resolution, and evidence that other shots of WTC 7, not obscured by dust or smoke, are most likely available for NIST to examine and to Share with us, especially considering that <a href="http://www.construction.com/NewsCenter/Headlines/ENR/20021209g.asp">NIST made a public appeal</a> in 2002, for photos of WTC 7.<br><img src="http://home.comcast.net/~qvc/wtc7b.jpg">