View Single Post
Old 01-24-2008, 06:34 PM   #164 (permalink)
FoolThemAll
Walking is Still Honest
 
FoolThemAll's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by JinnKai
I similarly reject the position of pro-life individuals who believe that the cells, even in a "human-like" arrangement, somehow constitute "human life", particularly at the moment of CONCEPTION! I fail to see how that a position like that could coexist with a belief that antibiotics are an acceptable practice?

Why? Because for much of a pregnancy, especially immediately following conception, the magnitude of cells in a zygote is equal to the number of cells constituting a bacterial infection.
But it's not a bacterial infection.

There's gotta be some elaboration here you left out. I don't think you meant to construct an argument that could be demolished with nothing but the above six words.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pig
It can be shown that a fetus is a living thing, just like cauliflower and organs and many other things...what can't be shown is that it s a separate human life form. If you can prove this, beyond a shadow of doubt, please share because you will change my view on the matter.
The problem here is not science. The problem here is language.

I can easily show you that it's a separate human life form. Watch: it's an organism with human DNA and the embedded, self-contained potentiality of each of the necessary vital organs associated with human beings. And it requires no additional blueprint - only additional sustenance - to reach that point.

Thus, it's obviously a separate human life form. It fits the definition.

"No, it's obviously NOT a separate human life form. Your definition's all wrong."

Oh? And what objective, empirical process did you use to arrive at the correct definition?

...yep. The science is on my side. And it's on your side as well. Because the real quibble is not over facts, but over moral interpretations of those facts. The real question is this: why should/shouldn't we value that clump of cells?

And no laboratory experiment is going to give either side the answer. It isn't a matter of science. It isn't a matter of demonstration. You can't show value. You can only allude to it and stubbornly fight for it without the benefit of being able to 'show' it. Which is what we all do.
__________________
I wonder if we're stuck in Rome.

Last edited by FoolThemAll; 01-24-2008 at 06:47 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
FoolThemAll is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360