View Single Post
Old 01-24-2008, 01:33 PM   #145 (permalink)
Infinite_Loser
Junkie
 
Infinite_Loser's Avatar
 
Location: Lake Mary, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton
It's as evasive as the "if you don't want kids don't have sex" position. Neither really offers anything of value to the discussion. That was kind of my whole point.
I already know what you were 'trying' to get out and, no, it's not equal to my position. In a society where we advocate personal responsibility, it's amazing how readily one is to toss aside that concept when they feel like it. You (Not singling you out in particular) still haven't been able to come up with a reason why I'm wrong-- Other than, of course, "Because that's what humans do", hence why I called it evasive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by abaya
There are no equal rights in a discussion about pregnancy. The fact is that it is still the woman's body, not the man's. And it is the man's sperm, not his body, and not even his child yet (assuming the dominant argument for abortion, which is that it is a bunch of cells). It is a fetus, and as such, it belongs to its harborer until it emerges.
This skirts dangerously close to sounding like the justification upon which women were/have been entrapped throughout history (Properties of their father/husbands to be done with as pleased, etc.).

Anyway, biology and fetal development aside (Which I'm convinced 99% of pro-abortionists don't really understand), I find your attitude quite appalling. A fetus doesn't belong to the woman, otherwise she'd be able to do as she wishes with it when she wants (And she can't, as I'm sure you're well aware) nor is a fetus an extension of your body as you have no direct control over it's development.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jewels443
A quick albeit unrelated response to an unrelated statement by IL, be careful of stats. The percentages you quote are based on "reported" abortions. When it was still illegal, there were back-alley practitioners who took advantage of young ladies who "got in trouble". Those were amongst those not reported.
Already responded to that. Unless you can, with confidence, assume that nearly 25% of women were self-aborting their unborn children prior to 1970, then I'm going to have to say that the number of abortions has indeed skyrocketed since 1973-- Not because they're more needed than they were in the past, but because people are relying on them more so as a form of birth control then they were in the past.
__________________
I believe in equality; Everyone is equally inferior to me.

Last edited by Infinite_Loser; 01-24-2008 at 01:41 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Infinite_Loser is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360