Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Crompsin
... and I say it isn't murder if they aren't sucking on a delicious booby yet!
You assume I define the following: fetus = person. Turns out? I don't.
|
And there's the almost-inevitable stalemate. (Not really over person, though, that's a legal term. That fact can be changed by the stroke of a pen.)
I don't understand how it couldn't be considered a human being. Presumably, you don't understand how it could be. To me, nine months of normal mobility and health is easily not as important as that unborn child. To you, nine months of normal mobility and health is easily more important than that clump of cells.
And it comes down to your "you're unjustly imposing your will on another human being" versus my "I'm responding to the unjust imposition of one will on another human being".
That's the script, right? Just figured I'd lay it out and save some time. But let me know if I'm missing/misunderstanding something of your position.
(p.s. - not to you - 'QFT' is a pretty childish toy to use in a contentious and unsettled debate like this.)