Did I influence your emotion or anyone else here? I honestly don't think so.
It takes more than your perception of my post to make it a logical fallacy. Granted, Bill O'Reilly gets away with that sort of claim every day, *and* there are more thoughtful members participating in this thread that would never allow a self-serving boo-hoo go unchallenged, by me or anyone else.
I can only repeat, once again, that I don't find the plight of the father under any number of circumstances worthy of forcing a woman to carry a child to term. That is the bottom line that your argument, isn't it?