Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kings_32
|
Classic appeal to authority. If scientific evidence can be provided, I'll consider it. I don't consider it evidence to watch videos that appear to be filmed with the camera and props upside. Just because someone important believes something irrational does not make it rational or credible.
Quote:
|
People can say there were no plane crashes on 9/11 (especially at the WTC) for one simple reason: there are people who looked at the evidence and know there were no plane crashes on 9/11. (And I'm talking about the real evidence, not the propaganda.)
|
It's easy to come to a conclusion when you decry anything that doesn't support your side as propaganda. Millions of people saw the second plane hit on live TV, and there are videos of the first hitting. They left plane-sized and plane-shaped holes in the non-reinforced structure of the towers. The Pentagon is a heavily fortified building that withstood all but the most massive part of the plane. Large sections of fuselage, engine and landing gear pieces, and piles of luggage are visible in photos taken after the crash.
I started out believing the conspiracy theories because I didn't see evidence to contradict them. When I stopped hearing just what I wanted to hear, the evidence didn't add up to a conspiracy.