Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
kings_32, you didn't bother to read any of the posts in this thread, did you?
|
The_Jazz, I read some of them... just enough to know that the real issues aren't being discussed. For instance, where did the hundreds of tons of steel go? Why did the government contract with sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society for the NIST Report?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MSD
Yes. I should probably post a thread about it to prevent any confusion.
At least we agree on something. I'm also surprised anyone has the gall to claim that the Hutchison effect is anything but fraud. these days. I really don't see how anyone could suggest with a straight face that there were no planes, especially at the WTC. Now I remember why I abandoned this thread months ago.
|
Regarding the Hutchison Effect, watch this statement by Nick Cook:
&o=1
People can say there were no plane crashes on 9/11 (especially at the WTC) for one simple reason: there are people who looked at the evidence and know there were no plane crashes on 9/11. (And I'm talking about the real evidence, not the propaganda.)