Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
They won't make a real case because there is no real case. There's too much evidence to contradict any of the official stories.
It should be this:
1) Government makes it's case
2) The case is disproved by facts.
3) We ask for the real story.
We aren't responsible for figuring out what happened, it is their responsibility to tell us.
|
The December 18, 2007 NIST meeting was a "bombshell" of disclosure and further postponement....now the minutes of the meeting are available, I posted the link in the bottom of my last post. No diesel fuel fire says, NIST, just 20 minutes long, roving fired, feeding on room contents at an estimated 4 lbs. of combustible material per square foot of floor area, with ventilation limited....and this was a big story in the months after 9/11....now NIST doesn't even link the meeting on it's main WTC page
http://wtc.nist.gov/media/ or anything else since 2005, and the media provides NO COVERAGE of the 12/18/07 meeting, or of it's disclosures.
<h2>Where is the media coverage? Isn't one major political party's platform totally invested in "9/11", aren't we told we are at war, because 9/11 changed everything? What happened on 9/11, why isn't a major revision to the theory behind the collapse of 47 story tall WTC 7...diesel fuel fed fires, NEWS????</h2>