|
Ustwo, you have to be trying really hard to think that the evidence you presented is unequivocal proof that Edwards did any of the things you accused him of. As far as i can tell, each piece you quoted allows for the fact that Edwards' cases might have been on the level.
It's kind of typical tactic though. Talk about why you hate certain lawyers, bring up the fact that Edwards is a lawyer, cover your libel bases by acknowledging that you have no evidence that Edwards did anything in any way improper, then go on about how much you hate certain lawyers. It's a fancy way of trying to get folks to come to a certain conclusion without actually having evidence to support that conclusion.
Going even further, as much as i don't like the phrase, i would imagine that as a proponent of the free market it's right up your ally: Don't hate the player, hate the game. The american economic system has created a market for lawyering and as such it is only natural that lawyers should exploit this market for all that they can. Since when is it like you to come down so hard on a fella just trying to earn a buck?
|