View Single Post
Old 01-13-2008, 08:50 AM   #30 (permalink)
Tophat665
Minion of the scaléd ones
 
Tophat665's Avatar
 
Location: Northeast Jesusland
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU2003
the prolem is that it has prevented mostgroups fom getting any representation. There are very few Libermans who can win (a senator seat) as an independant.
And let's all thank the man Jesus for that, say thankee. Leiberman is a prick of the frist water. He is proof that the point that Ustwo made and you replied to is absolutely wrong. The inmates have taken over the asylum.

Quote:
In presidental politics it makes sense to have a run-off, but in the congres, there should be a system where you vote for the party that will represent you. I think if you had a ballot like this:
_ Republican
_ Democratic
_ Libertarian
_ Green
_ Constitution
_ Socialist
_ Anarcist
_ ...

You would see a differnt breakdown in the house seats than right now. The problem with that is you would see these political parties probably, and they would be one issue parties that would sell their votes on issues that they don't care about.

_ Evangelical
_ Jewish
_ Black
_ Latinio
_ White
_ Feminist
_ NRA
_ Vetrens

Although it is good having someone from your local area represent you, I feel that the states should have more power, and the local state representative and your two senators should be enough. And it is good that the people have some say as to who 'the party' picks, but there is very little chance that a majority of people in a certain area will elect a third party person (since most people feel their vote is 'wasted', or they really don't like the other candidate).
We spent a good deal of blood and treasure breaking away from England. Let's not import their parliament. Actually, while there is something to be said for proportional representation, that thing is that it will never, Never, NEVER be allowed to happen. There is far too much interest vested in the current system.

Quote:
As for the OP, I feel that if Hillary did win, there is very little (outside of Iraq) that she could get done. At least with a Republican house/senate that is bound to happen, just like it did to Bush.

I think the right might play nice with Obama for a while, although I doubt he would get much done either.
There is very little inside of Iraq she could get done either.
__________________
Light a man a fire, and he will be warm while it burns.
Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
Tophat665 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360