Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MrSelfDestruct
This article from George Mason University makes some good points about the affidavits and why his testimony isn't necessarily as credible as it seems.
http://hnn.us/articles/39936.html |
It sounds like a good wrap up, much like the warren commission. I think the movment by eye witness survivors demanding justice to this day , is for only that justice. Its stated by many that the worn out song of anti-zionism isnt going to make this one go awway. Thats is a cop out in any case, especially since there is no "rift" to widen becasue there is no rift. Any means of hardware to go defend the ship were called back for some "reason". There were two sides at play here, not an evil zionistic entity bent on ignoring a US flag flying clear.
He did get some details straightened out instead of 172 injured ssailors, 171 and one NSA. I might have missed it, but he is saying no bombs were dropped. OK Does that mean he is stating there was no napalm? I have to read it again to formulate exactly where he took this.