|
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
If someone began a new thread in TFP politics with an OP founded on an article linked from www.ufomag.com , claiming evidence has been uncovered that one of the 2008 presidential race front runners is an extraterrestrial, would those who objected be put through the same exercise of "ignoring the source" and challenging the specifics in the article, as we are asked to do, again and again, in response to the examples like the ones in the OP?
Can we progress here by mutually agreeing that posting from worldnetdaily as a sole citation, and posting solely from sources fronting themselves as non-partisan, but are EXPOSED as partisan and compromised as American Center for Voting Rights, has been exposed to be, is to be treated as if nothing was posted, or must we ignore the source and challenge the specifics, something we would not be doing in response to a single source article linked from www.ufomag.com , (I hope ?) |
So you are basically creating a blacklist of "biased" sources? why not just create a crib sheet that states which ones are biased and in which manner?
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
|