View Single Post
Old 01-10-2008, 09:38 AM   #27 (permalink)
dc_dux
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Perhaps there is a misunderstanding of the issue in question.

It is not opposition to the necessity for a valid ID in order to vote. That is not being questioned.

The question I raised in the OP was if a specific requirement for a STATE-ISSUED PHOTO ID disproportionately impacts particular segments of registered or eligible voters (seniors, minorities) and/or if the rationale for the law (to prevent fraud) is legitimate when the state can produce no evidence of fraud under the old (pre-photo) voter id requirements.

In Indiana, there is a larger percentage of seniors -as opposed to all voting age citizens -who do not possess a STATE-ISSUED PHOTO ID and are now barred from casting a regular ballot until they obtain such an ID. Apparently some 30,000-40,000 seniors who have been voting for years are affected.

Is this an undue burden on a particular class of citizens? To not be an undue burden, the STATE-ISSUED PHOTO IDs should be both free and easily accessible...and they are not.

I wont raise the question of the political motivation of the legislatures in question...intent is much more difficult to prove.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 01-10-2008 at 09:43 AM..
dc_dux is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73