|
host, I'm not "sure" you know what "quotes" are for. "Quotation marks" are used when you're "directly" quoting someone, not when you're trying to "emphasize" something. It's really "distracting", because it makes it seem like you're actually "quoting" something.
These words:
came up
filters
tuned
ways
moderated
genre
news site
articles
details
non-partisan
source
...did not need to be quoted. "American Center for Voting Rights" is barely legitimate. It is a title, but it could be quoted provided it it referenced in another document. "Non-partisan source" could've been quoted, but not individually. As a general rule of thumb, you should never quote single words.
I wouldn't ordinarily nitpick this, but I had trouble reading it because of your usage of quotation marks. I ran it through a program that removed quotation marks, and it was actually quite an improvement; I was able to read through the entire thing.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
|