Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I accuse you of posting links that are often very little related to the topic, often dont' support your point, and require hours of sifting threw to find out what you were trying to get to.
Sorry you are sick of it, you will note in that voting rights thread the source was attacked but not the information from the source. If the information is false then there is an issue otherwise you are just protesting nothing.
|
Yes, you have accused me, and, on the rare occasion when you have posted a specific example, I have explained why I've posted what I have posted, i.e., my intent in posting it. I do not know if you have read my responses, because you never acknowledge them:
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthr...83#post2354483 (Post #15)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
No, not at all.
He links a story that doesn't support what he is saying. Its a common theme with him. What is says is that another supplement BESIDES the usual corn/soy flower mix works just as well.
Maybe he just doesn't understand the science, I obviously don't do this for every post, I do have a life, this one just happened to be mercifully short on links.....
|
My response to your criticism:
http://http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/...97#post2354897 (Post #18)
Your criticism displayed in the following link, was posted several weeks later. If you post your reaction (on the other thread) to my explanation in post #18, I'll reply to this:
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showpos...3&postcount=57
You've also posted, more than a few times, that you do not read my posts. You've declared this, frequently enough, to give me the impression that you are encouraging others not to read my posts. Thank you for reading and responding to this one.
On this thread, you've posted:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
.....the source was attacked but not the information from the source. If the information is false then there is an issue otherwise you are just protesting nothing.
|
<h3>Above is the core issue to be addressed in this thread.</h3> You posted quotes from a 386 page report from a thoroughly (fraudulent is a reasonable description) discredited source. This was pointed out to you in a reply posted by another member. Your response to him was the same as above.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I have to wonder why the diebold machines didn't 'work' right in 2006 
Those lousy Republicans!!!!
http://www.politicalgateway.com/main...d.html?col=434
Quote:
Part one of a two-part series.
All reasonable people know it -- it was well documented by various media sources throughout the 2004 election and now we have the concrete proof: Democrats and their operatives were far and away more involved in voter intimidation, fraud, suppression and, yes, disenfranchisement, than Republicans. It's not even close. But don't take our word for it liberals, read the 368-page report by the non-partisan American Center for Voting Rights yourself.
|
Quote:
Remember the incident involving allegations of Democratic operatives slashing the tires of Republican get-out-the-vote vans in Milwaukee? Here are the actual indictments in the case:
The following is a list of the individuals charged with slashing tires on the morning of November 2, 2004, and their connections to the Democrat campaign in 2004:
Michael J. Pratt
* Paid $7,965.53 by the Democratic Party of Wisconsin in 2004
* Pratt’s father is former Acting Mayor Marvin Pratt, who chaired the Kerry-Edwards campaign in Milwaukee
Sowande Ajumoke Omodunde (a.k.a “Supreme Solar Allah”)
* Paid $6,059.83 by Gwen Moore for Congress and the Democratic Party of Wisconsin in 2004
* Son of U.S. Rep. Gwen Moore (D-WI)
Lewis Gibson Caldwell, III
* Paid $4,639.09 by Gwen Moore for Congress and the Democratic Party of Wisconsin in 2004
Lavelle Mohammad
* Paid $8,858.50 by the Democratic Party of Wisconsin and America Coming Together ($966 for canvassing work in June and July) in 2004
Justin J. Howell
* Paid $2,550.29 in 2004 by the Democratic Party of Wisconsin (62)
|
I'm not sure you want to go this route there dc, not sure at all.
|
Do you think your reaction is reasonable, considering that the source of the information you're asking the rest of us to react to, is thoroughly discredited, it was a partisan, sham "op" created solely to misrepresent that it was a partisan "op" created to spread misinformation about the "non-issue" of "voting fraud"....and considering that you've provided no backup sources for the information contained in the 386 page report from the discredited "American Center for Voting Rights ".
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
Ustwo.....do you really know the facts about the non-partisan American Center for Voting Rights.....the source of your examples of alleged voter suppression by the Democratic party.
I'm not sure you want to go this route there Ustwo, not sure at all.
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthr...12#post2377612 |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
|
My opinion is that your reaction is unreasonable because, since you cited quotes from a report that is discredited, is a fraud, you must accompany request for debate about the "facts" contained in the report, with legitimate support for the points you ask the rest of us to agree with, or to challenge.
When your source is as discredited as this 386 page report, and it's author are, it is as if you are starting all over again, when you ask for reaction to "the facts" that report contains. <h3>Isn't that reasonable?</h3>