Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lasereth
Apparently there's a huge rumor going around the Internet about the diebold machines borking the results and Obama really had 38% with Clinton at 34%. Has anyone else read this? The hand-counted votes are supposedly the aforementioned with the diebold machines putting Clinton winning. The page that had this information is currently DOSed. Can anyone else find anything, or is this just Internet rumors circulating with no basis as usual?
|
Yes I posted it earlier in the thread. It doesn't prove anything but looks pretty weird. Clinton was down by like 7-10 points in polls against obama then wins by 3. The difference in machines between her and obama was +8% to Clinton.
Plus on the otherside Romney magically gets 7% better on machines.
http://ronrox.com/paulstats.php?party=DEMOCRATS