View Single Post
Old 01-08-2008, 06:18 PM   #36 (permalink)
SecretMethod70
Human
 
SecretMethod70's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmadison
The problem with voting for President is that it only matters in a few states. With the Electoral College, you're vote doesn't matter in most states. For example, I live in California. I WAS a Bush supporter and voted for him twice; however, California's Electoral College votes all went to Gore and Kerry, respectively. So, in essence, I didn't ever vote for Bush (Which makes me feel better about myself and my past character decisions). Georgia is historically a Red State, thus, no matter who you vote for, you will be voting Republican. In many states, the politicians who makeup the EC do not even have to vote with the popular vote, which would effectively make all votes in that state worthless.

I would say that if Georgia is a state that the EC has to vote on the popular vote, or they decide to do away with the EC system, you should vote for the candidate you believe in. On the flip side, if it always has been a Red State (or a Blue State) and always will be one regardless of the popular vote, it really doesn't matter. In that case, stick to voting on referendums and city and state government officials, because that is the only way you can change the color of most states.
The idea that your vote is less important because of the Electoral College is just plain false. Quite simply, your vote is more likely to determine the outcome of a state election (Electoral College) than it is to determine the outcome of a national election (popular vote). It's better for your vote to be one of 30 million than one of 300 million. Yes, sometimes that may work to your disadvantage (2000), but that is a very rare occurrance.

That's not to say the United States election system isn't without problems, but the Electoral College is the undeserving scapegoat of those problems. If you want to talk about what really needs to be changed, it's how we count votes. When it comes to producing the candidate that the most people can feel decent about, the plurality system we use is one of the worst. We need to count votes using a method which complies with the Condorcet criterion, and this would only make voting marginally more complicated for the average American. Instead of voting on one person, all they'd have to do is rank candidates. It's the way we count votes that is at the core of unpleasant election results, not the Electoral College.
__________________
Le temps détruit tout

"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling
SecretMethod70 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360