View Single Post
Old 01-07-2008, 07:52 PM   #100 (permalink)
filtherton
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
This makes much sense. I like this. The important difference, however, is that there is a lack of focus on the supernatural or what cannot be seen. Science focuses on what could be and then seeks to validate it. It's as though the predominantly scientific-minded (via, to some degree, atheism) picked up the torch of knowledge (and, therefore, the authority to postulate it as well) from the predominantly religious-minded. What each were seeking is essentially the same, it's just that the latter have been "blessed" with the tools to better see and discover this knowledge, and, moreover, to record and archive it.

I think a movement toward atheism is a natural and necessary process that the mind needs to undergo in order to continue making sense of the universe. And I think you've described atheism wonderfully, filtherton.
Science should focus on what could be and its validation, but science only really enters into the picture when validation is somehow a possibility. I think that speaking strictly from a scientific perspective, there is no such thing as "the supernatural" because everything is natural. Even if there existed such a class of phenomena, the unverifiability of an idea doesn't necessarily mean it lies in the realm of the supernatural, if that were the case we'd be talking about theoretical physicists with the same level of reverence that we reserve for ghost hunters (no doubt that some folks do). If god, or ghosts exist, then it would only mean that our understanding of the natural laws as they are currently formulated are deficient.

This being the case, science and theology aren't necessarily at odds, provided the theology in question is adaptable to advancements in scientific knowledge. This also means that atheism isn't necessarily some sort of advanced process, just another way of looking at things.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Using all available information based on observation to answer a question as best we can.

I can get more formal if you think it will help.
Thank you.

This definition doesn't necessarily preclude using critical thought as a means of coming to the conclusion that god exists.

Last edited by filtherton; 01-07-2008 at 07:55 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
filtherton is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360