Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
They know people aren't listening anymore.
|
NIST should suggest to the State Dept. that they revise the propaganda posted on their website:
Quote:
http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archiv...16-241966.html
You Are In: USINFO > Resource Tools > Identifying Misinformation
9/11 Revealed?
New book repeats false conspiracy theories
The Collapse of World Trade Center 7
Allegation: 9/11 Revealed suggests that the 47-story World Trade Center 7 building, which collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, was intentionally demolished. The primary piece of evidence for this is a comment that Mr. Larry Silverstein, who owned the World Trade Center complex, made on the September 2002 television documentary American Rebuilds. Mr. Silverstein said:
I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. I said, you know, “We've had such terrible loss of life that the smartest thing to do is just pull it.” And they made that decision to pull it and we watched the [World Trade Center 7] building collapse.
9/11 Revealed and other conspiracy theorists put forward the notion that Mr. Silverstein’s suggestion to “pull it” is slang for intentionally demolishing the WTC 7 building.
Facts: On September 9, 2005, Mr. Dara McQuillan, a spokesman for Silverstein Properties, issued the following statement on this issue:
Seven World Trade Center collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001, after burning for seven hours. There were no casualties, thanks to the heroism of the Fire Department and the work of Silverstein Properties employees who evacuated tenants from the building.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a thorough investigation of the collapse of all the World Trade Center buildings. The FEMA report concluded that the collapse of Seven World Trade Center was a direct result of fires triggered by debris from the collapse of WTC Tower 1.
In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building.
Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of the building and at 5:20 p.m. the building collapsed. No lives were lost at Seven World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.
As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology has stated unequivocally, “NIST has seen so evidence that the collapse of WTC 7 was caused by bombs, missiles, or controlled demolition,” in its Collapse of WTC 7 report (p. 6). NIST’s working hypothesis for the collapse of WTC 7 is that it was caused by the collapse of a critical column due to “fire and/or debris induced structural damage.” There was substantial damage to WTC 7 when the nearby WTC 1 tower collapsed and fires began shortly afterwards. <h3>Also, WTC 7 was a very unusual building because it was built over an existing Con-Edison power generation substation, which contained two large 6,000 gallon fuel tanks for the emergency generation of power. The fuel from these tanks could have contributed to the intense heat that apparently weakened the supporting columns in WTC 7.</h3>
|
The NIST meeting was held on Dec. 18, and everyone, including all journalists, tv, radio, and independent news hounds were too busy with their near final, pre-holiday preparations, to bother to report on what transpired at the meeting.
Or, they did take notice, but their editors and news directors did not regard any of the reporting that was filed, as "newsworthy". NIST itself didn't bother to release a statement about the meeting or postponement of their WTC 7 report, or their new theory that the structural fires fed only on building materials and the contents strewn about, on each of the 47 floors.
There is this, for you to "chew" on:
http://missingsteel.blogspot.com/
http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php...2&postcount=58
It will be at least, just shy of seven years after the fact, officially confirmed now, (quietly...) ,by NIST, before we can expect a "final report" on what NIST determines has most likely caused WTC 7, to collapse. I'm wondering if they'll even bother to disclose the next postponement.....
How many years, minimum, will have to pass, with no official plausible answer, as to what caused WTC 7 to collapse, before skeptics will begin to even suspect that our concerns were squarely rooted?
The "missing metal" documentation, is the tale of a "circle jerk". "Real" journalist, who are in the business of speaking truth to power, would at least sit the two "2008" democratic senators down, after asking them or a key staff member to review only what is contained on this page of this thread, and then ask them to react to this information, on camera.
Before you even reply....I know....what the fuck could I be thinking, to post such gibberish? Maybe it is time ti move on, maybe it's been time, since 12/12/00, to look for another country to reside in?