Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Crompsin
Sweet! Disagreement.
<snip>
New official TFP tagline left in for posterity.
|
Yes, use of a sword would likely sway a jury, and probably against the sword-user. As you said, they are fucking antiquated. For someone to use something that seems so rare and archaic, they MUST have some vile ulterior intent, non?
Anyway, my original post about legal interpretation was from the point of view of legal folk (lawyers, judges) most likely. Though I could be slightly incorrect, as the legal system seems to have a hardon for demonizing firearms.