Originally Posted by Moyaboy

I think it's funny. I see people talking all over the web about how great XP is now that Vista is out and on it's way. I also found articles that claimed XP is terrible and the poster will not use anything other than Win98 or 2000. Years later the dialogue is repeating itself but now with different versions of Microsoft's OS's.

It's true the demands for a system running Vista is higher, but look at the technology 5 or 6 years ago. You wouldn't have thought all of this would be available. The only reason XP runs as good as it does now is because newer technology allows for better preformance. The same will be for Vista.

I don't think that XP on a 200MHz, 128mb of ram will be fun nowadays, technology took care of that. (If any of you are running that configuration, I applaud you. You have a lot of patience)

I too am running Vista. I have found no faults that everyone is getting upset over. The laptop I am running on was 'Designed for XP'. But Vista runs better than XP did.

As for testing I tested it for 2 years once I was able to be on the beta team.