View Single Post
Old 01-03-2008, 07:38 PM   #67 (permalink)
jorgelito
All important elusive independent swing voter...
 
jorgelito's Avatar
 
Location: People's Republic of KKKalifornia
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiger777
Do more research before you start name dropping. Clearly if Einstein believed in some type of supernatural power it wasn't any God in any religion I've ever seen. It's clear many people misunderstand what Einstein is meaning when he uses the oh so loaded word God. He appears to use it to try to encompass the seemingly intelligent properties of the universe, the order and various universal laws that allow for life on earth to prosper.

"I cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves. Neither can I nor would I want to conceive of an individual that survives his physical death; let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egoism, cherish such thoughts."

'The desire for guidance, love, and support prompts men to form the social or moral conception of God. … The man who is thoroughly convinced of the universal operation of the law of causation cannot for a moment entertain the idea of a being who interferes in the course of events. … A God who rewards and punishes is inconceivable to him … .'

'During the youthful period of mankind's spiritual evolution human fantasy created gods in man's own image. … The idea of God in the religions taught at present is a sublimation of that old concept of the gods. … In their struggle for the ethical good, teachers of religion must have the stature to give up the doctrine of a personal God … .'

'Certain it is that a conviction, akin to religious feeling, of the rationality or intelligibility of the world lies behind all scientific work of a higher order. This firm belief, a belief bound up with deep feeling, in a superior mind that reveals itself in the world of experience, represents my conception of God. In common parlance this may be described as "pantheistic" (Spinoza).'

And this came from a Christian site I think, so there! As for Newton you're correct he was religious.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/crea...1/einstein.asp
Dude, relax a bit, this is not a pissing contest. I have done plenty of research thank you. I really don't see the disagreement. Your own source (one that I've read) if you continue the whole quote (See Baraka's post) clearly states that Einstein was a very religious man. No problem there. I share his belief as well (as well as Spinoza's).

Again, the point is that religion and science are two very different things but not mutually exclusive. Plenty of scientists are religious and plenty of religious people believe in science. I really don't understand the antagonism and hatred directed at religious folk.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Yea I was going to post it but no need to be that harsh. Religious groups have been trying to tie in Einstein into this sort of things for years, perhaps the worst example I read was in a work of fiction by Frederik Pohl where a computer Einstein personality went temporarily insane when he discovered that the universe was pretty much standard science fiction like with no apparent need/place for God. Apparently even Pohl bought into the concept that Einstein was some kind of strong believer, when while he was alive Einstein was often criticized by religious groups for his apparent lack of faith.

So its understandable that a lot of people assume Einstein was somehow religious, I think its been a conscious goal of some groups to try to tie into the one scientist/genius everyone knows of. Its also dishonest of course.
It's ok Ustwo, I didn't think it was harsh but thank you.

I disagree that it is dishonest to claim Einstein as a religious man. He says so himself. Just because he is religious does not diminish his scientific achievements. The reason I chose Einstein as a an example was to illustrate that religion and science are not incompatible or mutually exclusive. I think it is dishonest to claim otherwise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
Being the genius that he was, it is difficult to pigeonhole Einstein's mind into one classification. He thought a lot about God, religion, and science and how they all interacted in the universe. Whether he believed in a figure that we could call God is irrelevant. He was keen on viewing the universe and how it worked. To say Einstein was non-religious would be false. To say he believed in a personal god would also be false. He criticized indoctrination of the church, but saw the value of pursing the "laws of God." He criticized both religious institutions and atheists:
About God, I cannot accept any concept based on the authority of the Church. As long as I can remember, I have resented mass indocrination. I do not believe in the fear of life, in the fear of death, in blind faith. I cannot prove to you that there is no personal God, but if I were to speak of him, I would be a liar. I do not believe in the God of theology who rewards good and punishes evil. My God created laws that take care of that. His universe is not ruled by wishful thinking, but by immutable laws.

—W. Hermanns, Einstein and the Poet—In Search of the Cosmic Man (Branden Press, Brookline Village, Mass., 1983), p.132, quoted in Jammer, p.123.
I was barked at by numerous dogs who are earning their food guarding ignorance and superstition for the benefit of those who profit from it. Then there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is of the same kind as the intolerance of the religious fanatics and comes from the same source. They are like slaves who are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle. They are creatures who—in their grudge against the traditional "opium of the people"—cannot bear the music of the spheres. The Wonder of nature does not become smaller because one cannot measure it by the standards of human moral and human aims.

— Einstein to an unidentified adressee, Aug.7, 1941. Einstein Archive, reel 54-927, quoted in Jammer, p. 97
How does this apply to this thread? Well, this thread is about theism. I suppose it depends on how you apply it. Is it the theism of church dogma, or is it the theism of religious truth as applied to the pursuit of scientific truth?
Very well written Baraka, thank you.

Last edited by jorgelito; 01-03-2008 at 07:41 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
jorgelito is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360