View Single Post
Old 01-03-2008, 01:32 AM   #28 (permalink)
host
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467

.....Also, if someone posts a bunch of articles from a biased source, for people to read, but does not add anything of their own (maybe a few sentences) then nothing is achieved either. The average poster/reader feels they can find their own sources to read based on their own bias, why comment on something that even the poster really doesn't comment on?....
pan, all information is not equal, and your entire premise, IMO, is contradicted by the entire history of discourse of American politics.

Some will regard even these linked pages as "biased".
http://www.google.com/search?q=host+...e=off&filter=0

How does your "formula" fit with debates on issues like WMD in Iraq, abolition of slavery in the U.S., or what is the appropriate way to react to a thread, posted on a politics forum, that is titled:

"Please take a moment to pause, and think of our Military overseas this Christmas" in a politcal environment where an appreciable number believe that most of the military "overseas" are involved in illegal occupations.

There is a reason that some people limit themselves to never discussing religion or politics in public. There is a reason why there is a separate "politics" forum at TFP.

It is a challenge to participate on a political discussion forum on the internet. The forum at TFP is already moderated. You propose to remove the challenge of participating.

Why not propose a new forum restricted to the discussion of political feelings? That way, the implications and consequences of "owning" (attempting to advance) a political opinion, need never be confronted, recognized, or fully considered.

Folks who want to "ban all abortion", need never be exposed to information about the consequences to poorer women of childbearing age, versus the lack of consequences of the ban to wealthy women who have the option of travel out of the jurisdiction of the ban, to obtain safe, skilled, sterile clinical abortion services....they can just "feel" their opinion without exposure to information that might make them have a choice of ignoring what it is that influences others involved in a discussion to THINK otherwise.

...And, they can "feel" their pro abortion ban opinion, on a new and improved TFP politics discussion forum. No thank you, pan.
host is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360