Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
host I read very few of the links you post, we are currently going over this sort of thing on the politics board, so I find it somewhat disheartening you are now bringing that style to the life board.
Though now I see I was wrong to direct you to the paranoia thread. Really I think you would be best served with this thread.
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthread.php?t=128738 |
Okay....now you're "directing me" to the humor thread.....
I posted what purpose the summer, 2006 "liquid explosives smuggled onto airliners plot" was actually hyped to the press for:
Quote:
|
...Senior ministers believe public concern about terrorism is now at such a level that they will be able to reintroduce the controversial detention powers, which were rejected in favour of a 28-day limit following the 7/7 attacks...
|
Again, I've posted enough linked news reporting and details from the pages of the 9/11 Commission report, to persuade a reasonable person that there has been no responsible, consistant disclosure by the US and UK governments to justify ANY post 9/11 airport security "enhancements"....and you've reacted by bothering to post that
"[you've] read very few of the links", and by suggesting that I move my posts to the "paranoia" and "humor" forums.
Unlike the inconsistant and unbelievable claims I've posted from the Bush and Blair administrations related to the 9/11 attacks and the "liquid explosives plot", I've provided consistant, verifiable information that contradicts their bullshit.
You've posted that you won't read what I've provided....you're correct, it is a similar dynamic to what happens on the politics forum. Time and again, fact supported arguments are countered with innuendo and weak smear attempts....