Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
....and, if I'm not prying too much, did you and roachboy follow up on the idea, discussed a while back, of enjoying a beer, or two, together?
|
No and its my fault, but after much internal debate I've decided to keep my anonymity. It allows me to post freer.
But back to the topic, so on the one hand, if she died by a gun its more of a martyr thing, but on the other hand if they had a gun its horrible security over a bomb. So either it was governments fault if their WAS a gun and the government doesn't want there to be a gun? Still doesn't explain the statement of why a gun would be such bad security, even when everyone KNOWS there was a bomb.
And still the family doesn't want a formal autopsy.