which means that it's difficult NOT to see the government as involved to one extent or another in this assassination...if it is musharaf-as-authoritarian-leader who alone is capable of staving off civil war that emerges from this---then it is musharaf who benefits from it, no?
my initial thought this morning when i read about this was of the assassination of malcolm x. but perhaps this is not relevant--i would hope it isn't.
if my speculative take on things is correct, this is a very very dangerous game.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|