Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I do have to wonder, what do you think congress is afraid of that would make them so reluctant to nail a political opponent? They never had such reservations in the past, look at all the investigations done 'just because' by prior past democratic congresses of republican presidents.
Perhaps, just perhaps, there are real reasons for it of which you know not.
Personally I say go for it, my guess is it can only make democrats look bad for some reason, otherwise they would be all over it.
|
Let's take a 'wild' guess, shall we? It is now known that Bush & Friends began domestic spying before 9-11. It would be reasonable to ask who the targets were, don't you think? Great Scott! It's the same Cheney and Rumsfeld that provided illegal wire taping for Nixon, now doing it for Bush.
The targets then were Nixon's political enemies. Do I need a crayon and a Big Chief tablet to spell out the rest?
Perhaps, just perhaps, there are real reasons that are intuitively obvious. Granted, thinking outside the black and white box can be difficult, if not impossible. If someone as limited as I can do it, I hold out hope for you to step beyond your comfort zone, as well.