Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sun Tzu
According to pangea the continents will eventually collide once again.
If it is a stretch that earth may have been 80% of its present size millions of years ago then it places an enormous amount of reliance on volcanic activity spouting out mass that just by chance fits together perfectly on all sides.
Looking at the model of pangea there was allot of ice connecting and disappearing mass. The accreation model loses almost none at all.
Is there any evidence of bottlenecking in the subduction zones? I also ust started looking so I dont know the answer to this
question; is there any other planet or moon in the solar system that has plate movement like Earth? Any that have been proven (theorized) to be expanding?
|
Ummm sea shells on mountain tops? Hello?
Rather than trying to explain science none here have studied in depth and few are even qualified to examine, lets cut to the chase.
The expanding earth theory not only doesn't explain things like the rocky mountains or the himalayan mountains it doesn't explain why there is ample evidence why the mountain ranges were once sea floor. They are not volcanic in nature, so something is driving them.