After researching a little more it appears that this theory stem from creationists (which Im not) or not in the traditional sense. Pangea certainly exlpains the oceans presence, but only accounts for the huge mass of land missing either from a collision that was slightly smaller than Earth, the moon was actually part of Earth at one time, or an extreme eruption on a grand scale. But Pangea would produce something larger than Hawaii wouldnt it?.
The mass of the Earth is quite precisely known now. The mass arriving from space is estimated.
How are they measuring subduction zones? Are they reachable?
The guy was not denying plate movement. The expanding Earth theory says that they were joined together on both sides rather than only one. This is supported by the fact that there are mid-ocean expansion ridges circling the earth and interconnected between _ALL_ of the continents.
" "Mobile magma plumes force us to reassess some of our most basic assumptions about the way the mantle operates," says John Tarduno, professor of earth and environmental sciences . "We’ve relied on them for a long time as unwavering markers, but now we’ll have to redefine our understanding of global geography." "
http://www.innovations-report.de/htm...cht-20701.html