Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
As the article said, the informant was very credible. This implies that the informant may have supplied accurate information in the past or had some sort of corroboration. So here's a question: should they never trust informants? Or are we done asking stupid black and white questions that ruin threads just like this one whenever there are either guns or police officers making mistakes?
|
no, I think i'll ask a bunch more stupid black and white questions since you can't supply decent answers to any.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|