Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
so which is it, they believed the informant implicitly, invading a law abiding citizens home? or they bungled the detailed investigation before applying for a no knock warrant?
|
As the article said, the informant was very credible. This implies that the informant may have supplied accurate information in the past or had some sort of corroboration. So here's a question: should they never trust informants? Or are we done asking stupid black and white questions that ruin threads just like this one whenever there are either guns or police officers making mistakes?