Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
"Irrelevant" is a strong word. The informant had a key role in this. Are you suggesting the informant should be absolved of all responsibility? It isn't the informant's job to kick down the door. Their job is to inform. What was the first thing that went wrong here?
|
Maybe the informant's informant lied? How far back can you go? The first thing that went wrong is irrelevant, because it's completely arbitrary. Maybe the first thing that went wrong was the cops deciding that their informant was credible in this particular instance.
What matters is that the police somehow used bad information or corrupted good information to break down the door of and start a gunfight with someone who was completely undeserving. If you are in a position where you are knocking down someone's door with guns drawn, you better be damn sure that you're knocking down the right door, and if you happen to knock down the wrong door you need to be held accountable.