|
I am definitely not in favor of eugenics. It is not my intention to "hurt" low income families, rather to force an accounting of sorts. In other words, theoretically, it would be wise to wait until one had financial means before bringing a child into the world. I think it would be better for all involved. Once a couple was financially stable, they could better provide for their child instead of having lots of children in poverty which is not good for the child (talking in general terms to illustrate the concept). Incidentally, child poverty is actually still a problem in the US. I guess I am trying to encourage better family planning and management.
Your tax after one or two kids is a great idea actually, it seems more "equitable" which is nice. But my main concern was one of affordability. To me it is irresponsible and unconscionable to have kids when you can't afford to have them.
I appreciate your data from Canada, but I assumed we were talking about the US. I think we have different population pressures.
The funny thing is Baraka, I had totally forgotten this thread is about carbon emissions! We have drifted way off course here LOL
|