View Single Post
Old 12-12-2007, 07:11 PM   #18 (permalink)
jorgelito
All important elusive independent swing voter...
 
jorgelito's Avatar
 
Location: People's Republic of KKKalifornia
Well, the idea is that, if you knew you had to pay a tax for having a child, maybe you would give it more thought. Instead of currently, where people have more kids so they can get more money from the government. I would like to correct this. I don't see it as population control but rather, more like fiscal responsibility. Like living within your means.

As for the tax to go to child care, nah, not really. I don't think there is a national childcare system here. I don't see it as empowering the wealthy, it doesn't have much to do with them. They already have a low birth rate even though they can afford to have more children.

But if you throw in a tax incentive to adopt or foster, then that could be a good balancer.

The other alternatives, forced abortion, one-child etc I am not in favor of (to put it politely).
jorgelito is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52