Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
I think the key here is to focus on the differences between activist judges making "quick fixes" and the need for continuing a practice of constitutional amendments.
|
this is exactly my point, insofar as changing the constitution. The framers put in a very specific way to change the constitution, so why not use that instead of handpicking lefty or righty judges to 'reinterpret' the constitution to mean what they want it to mean for an agenda?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|