|
I got through to half-way down page three... had to walk away while swearing and then came back to type this.
OK... If it is this pharmacists moral right to refuse to give the pill, shouldn't he have taken that up with the pharmacy? I mean... it's not like it would have been a secret to him.
At some point I imagine he had to have taken inventory or checked stock---AT SOME POINT while working noticed that there was this pill that he could not willingly give out as it is against his moral code. At that time, he should have made his objections known to the pharmacy. The company could have dealt with him then.
Now, if he never once noticed that this pill was there: he ought to get reprimanded for being either lazy, incompetent, or careless. From what I hear, attention to detail is one of those things you learn when you want to be a pharmacist, lest you drop the wrong pills into someone's bottle. No sources to back this up, only going off of what a friend that studies pharmacy tells me.
|