Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Push-Pull
What's unreasonable is to expect that the government will do things like this at some incredible cost involving countless people and yet not have one bit of tangible evidence for it. You'd think that at least one of the thousands of people involved would be willing to risk blowing the whistle......
|
Thats called a conspiracy.
If you have time or interest, here are 3 links to sites that are unrelated (source wise), dont mention any kind of government program, or even the word chemtrails. There is however a common denominator.
healthandenergy.com/asthma_triggers.htm
http://www.joem.org/pt/re/joem/fullt...VvLglg2L5j6yrw
(im working on fixing this link)
http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?re...12018&page=195
http://www.aklung.org/air-quality/anchorage-air-quality
Does this prove the government (or someone) is lacing the skies with harmful elements? It boils down to what you consider proof, and who you find providing the proof as credible. There lies the issue of why so many things are debatable. Allot of individuals I know base everything on what they see in the news. (Example: If GWB and Cheny had anything either to do with 911 or deliberately not preventing the events; it would be all over the news.)
Im just trying to clarify your point; are you stating its unreasonable because a whistleblower has not made headline news- thus putting the military and top leaders on trial for criminal acts, or are you stating it must not be true because there is no reason for "chemtrails" to be a reality vs contrails.
An interesting clip---
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6-RMuc0-fpc&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6-RMuc0-fpc&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
probable debunker point (its a home video there is no way to tell the varied height of the aircraft- one is simply at an elevation that will evaporate the crystals)
My response post debate after debate after debate (do the research, seek mulitple sources- avoid conspiracy sources that just openly state YES CHEMTRAILS EXSIST VIA NEW WORLD ORDER AGENDA) look for points that seem to present themselves over and over again.
As I state last year a simple experiment you can see first hand: If you live in a city where you see "trails- for the sake of the conversation". Start observing the one to two days you dont see trails. One might think that not seeing them a day out of the week is any big deal. Keep observing in the weeks to come and you will notice that every week has a trail free day.
If the trails were just ice crystals lingering behind; atmospheric conditions that would cause them evaporate one day and linger another would be a reasonable explanation. What are the odds that those conditions would only happen once or twice consistently EVERY week?