Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Augi
@ Filtherton:
Usually, they do not concern about what is known in science, but what is unknown or what is difficult to swallow in science, and use that as proof that there is a God. Sorry @ willravel for beating the dead horse (we'll have it into glue in no time) and for stealing your signature (it fits perfectly here):
"Just because something is inexplicted doesn't mean it's inexplicable."
|
Some of the greatest minds in the history of science believed that the order of the universe was evidence of the existence of a diety. There are a lot of folks who have no problem integrating science and theology into a cohesive belief system, because if one so desires the two can be mutually exclusive.
Quote:
On a personal note:
If there is/was a creator or there is a divine way to life: they only way we are going to understand it is through understanding: physics, psychology, and philosophy.
|
It all depends on whether you think science is capable of explaining everything, a belief which i think is akin to the deification of science.