Willravel

Move? You act as if there's not a church on every corner. They are everywhere. Unless you're not Christian (or less than 20% of the population), you're set. If you're not Christian, you're probably living near your mosque/synagogue/etc. anyway.
If it's an elective and it's totally 100% neutral, there is still a very serious chance that you've going to have problems. You know how insane some people get when their kids are exposed to other religions. I mean I'm sure you've heard about the French schools and burkas. And that was in uber-liberal, socialist France, not the United States of Jesus.
I learned about Christianity in Rome, the Dark Ages, Crusades, Diet of Worms, Reformation, settlement of the East Coast of North America, witch trials, the Vatican, etc. I leaned history.
I don't believe there should be publicly accredited private elementary schools, middle schools, high schools, or colleges that are religious. I suspect that you disagree. Knowing about god shouldn't be a part of getting any kind of scholastic diploma. Again, church is there to teach about religion, school is there to teach about everything else.
Would you also want astrology? How about holistic medicine? It's hardly a slippery slope as allowing religion into public schools is leading to the teaching of mythology in science classrooms. That's prevalence makes it a real life concern.
Kids can silently pray at recess or lunch. No one stops them from doing that. Setting aside time for structured learning of facts to have prayer time, which is what it's usually called, is taking away from education to allow for superstition. No one is stopping anyone from doing what they will on their own time, but school is about learning facts.
True compromise? Like having kids learn about how Jesus died on the cross and then letting them go next door to math class? That teaches them that Jesus is just as viable and reliable as math. Besides, atheism isn't even a belief. Atheism is zero sum. It's a lack. A lack of belief is not belief. A lack of belief is not belief.
If schools were taught with my exact philosophy, then the teachers would tell the children that religion is a product of groupthink with the occasional delusion. Is that taught? Absolutely not, because that would be putting church and state together. The middle ground is allowing each child to learn about their god or god in a church, where it belongs.
Who is the extremist? The person who wants my children to learn about Vishnu because they don't get that school is supposed to be neutral.

And the NAACP stands for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored people... do obviously not being white is a religion. Besides, how many AA churches have you driven by? Have you ever had an atheist knock on your door to read from ATHEIOS NECRONOMICON, THE HOLY WORD OF ATHEOS! Do we even have any kind of coherant text or organization? Of course no.
I said that atheists as a whole do not have one solid moral code that they all stick to. Like, oh I dunno, two big tablets? We are all moral, but it's because we are allowed to freely develop morality on our own.

Suggesting atheists are immoral absolutely is bigotry, and you were clear in what you said. I expect an apology, or I expect you to defend every sin that a Christian has ever committed.
There's no such thing as atheistic fundamentalism. It's a contradiction in terms, as I demonstrated.
It's funny a Christian isn't familiar with the word "Gentile". Go ahead. Look it up. Now, look up atheist. Then come back and admit you don't know what "atheist" means.