11-21-2007, 09:52 AM
|
#58 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
|
If the president was not distracted, or not "on vacation so much"...as of Aug. 9th, he had <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/mason/5042364.html">spent 418 day</a>s of his presidency in Crawford, not to mention the additional time spent at Camp David, Kennebunkport, etc.....he would have made the effort to get Neil's name correct, the first time...it's the same as his own brother's name....and he would have signed an executive order barring the Pentagon attempt to take back the enlistment bonuses:
Quote:
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004758.php
Pentagon Official on Wounded Vet Story: "We're Not Sure What Happened"
By Paul Kiel - November 21, 2007, 12:34PM
Yesterday, we <a href="http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004754.php">noted</a> a story about Iraq veterans who were being asked to return part of their enlistment bonuses because their injuries prevented them from completing their tours. The story focused on one vet in particular, Jordan Fox from Pittsburgh.
Well, the story kicked up something of a firestorm, so Brigadier General Michael Tucker, deputy commanding general of Walter Reed (he was tapped after the scandal broke), showed up on Fox News early this morning.
Reacting to Fox's case, he said, "We're not sure what happened but we're gonna fix it." <h3>Here's the clip:</h3>
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004758.php
The problem goes far beyond just that one soldier, though. No numbers are available, but the story yesterday quoted estimates by veterans groups that this sort of thing happened to "thousands" of others.
Tucker said that army policy "is that soldiers who are wounded in combat or have line of duty investigation injuries... we will not go after a recoupment of any bonuses they receive." Recouping bonuses, he said, "doesn't pass the common sense test."
But notice that phrasing. While that policy, if implemented, would prevent injured soldiers from having to pay back bonuses they'd already received, they might still not receive their full enlistment bonus. That's because the Army could still withhold parts of the bonus on the basis that the soldiers didn't complete their full tour due to the injury.
Rep. Jason Altmire (D-PA), who introduced a bill last month that would require the Pentagon to pay bonuses to wounded vets in full within 30 days after discharge for combat-related wounds, said he was "heartened" by Tucker's announcement this morning that the Army won't seek repayment of bonuses. He added:
“However, I am disappointed that the policy does not go further by stating that wounded soldiers will also receive the remaining balance of future bonus payments. It is preposterous for our government to have a policy that says that a soldier who has sustained serious injuries in the field of battle has not fulfilled his or her service obligation."
Pentagon rules, Altmire says, prevent enlistees from receiving their full enlistment bonus unless they fulfill their entire military obligation.
|
Last edited by host; 11-21-2007 at 09:55 AM..
|
|
|