Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MrSelfDestruct
If that's just a good start, then what would be the ideal end that's fair for everyone? I think that the heads of a company (who would ideally be elected by the workers/owners) should be compensated more heavily for positive decisions and penalized more heavily than negative ones than the average worker because of the higher risk associated with decision making in their position. I'm not sure that you'd agree with that.
|
Elected company heads? It would be awesome to see someone elected head of our family company after running it for 12 years. I'm sure they could handle the responsibility even though they don't take care of their families or keep their court costs paid. The heads of a company already get compensated or punished based on their decisions, it's called the free market. Under your plan our company would be gone in less than a month and dozens of employees would be out of work as well.
__________________
It's time for the president to hand over his nobel peace prize.
Last edited by samcol; 11-20-2007 at 09:50 PM..
|