|
I'm interested to see what your friend comes up with in the experiment. I'm sitting in the equipment room at a film festival right now and can't watch the Youtube clips, but I will later.
The reason that I'm skeptical about multiple gunman theories is that I don't think they're necessary to explain what happened. Oswald was caught red handed with a rifle capable of producing the wounds we saw on tape, and he was a skilled marksman whose scores were alway high until shortly before his military discharge. There is no need for a second gunman to produce the results. Until evidence is provided that necessitates a second gunman, I am unlikely to be convinced that there was one. And yes, the ladder thing I was talking about is the one you posted, I remembered the numbers very incorrectly.
|